Are They Kidding?! Heavy Snow?
Forget
the media exaggerating the weather, now the National Weather Service is out forecasting “Heavy Snow” when accumulation is “less than one inch” and “1 to 2 inches”. Incredible.
I wonder if the government mindset that equates 1 – 2 inches of snow as “Heavy Snow” is the same as that which sees global warming in every fraction of weather change?
Malone Weather
I am still reconfiguring my weather station and the upload of data to MaloneToday.com. You can access information collected by my weather station at:
- WeatherUnderground: http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/hdfForecast?query=12953&searchType=WEATHER
- APRS: http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/wxpage.cgi?call=CW6998
Update:
I switched to Ambient Weather’s Virtual Weather Station software after being unable to resolve continued challenges with incorrect barometric pressure, humidity, and dew point readings, especially at low temperatures. The change was long overdue. It appears that all of my weather station readings are now being handled correctly and within APRS data QA norms.
My weather station:
- Oregon Scientific WMR-968
- Ambient Weather Virtual Weather Station
Owens in office illegally and maybe even with losing vote count?
The
Democrats in their desperation for votes on their health care plan may have set themselves up for a rather big embarrassment regarding the special election for New York’s 23rd Congressional District. Bill Owens is not the certified winner, he contested the results November 2, and yet was sworn in by desperate Democrats in Washington. Now, not only may he be in office illegally, he might even lose the vote count once all of the votes are counted and errors in original counts are corrected. It will serve the Democrats right if the results favor Doug Hoffman and Owens has to vacate his seat.
Previous Posts
- Commonsense from Governor Palin (December 4, 2009)
No, I am not for amnesty. .… Illegal aliens are called illegal for a reason. .… If they are not going to follow the rules they need to get out. – Sarah Palin Clear, direct, and absolutely correct. Source: Radio interview with Lars Larson, December 3, 2009. - Mr. President: Boycott Copenhagen; Investigate Your Climate Change “Experts” – Sarah Palin (December 3, 2009)
Governor Sarah Palin on Climategate: The president’s decision to attend the international climate conference in Copenhagen needs to be reconsidered in light of the unfolding Climategate scandal. The leaked e-mails involved in Climategate expose the unscientific behavior of leading climate scientists who deliberately destroyed records to block information requests, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in - Obama’s War of 1,000 Cuts (December 2, 2009)
Yes, Afghanistan is now Obama’s War. It was his since inauguration but make no mistake, from last night’s speech, it is clearly his and we can no longer blame Bush for the mess. Obama has now created the recipe for his own disaster: First, the military asked for as much as 60,000 troops, Obama gives them half, and Second, while - Global Warming? Show me the data! (November 30, 2009)
It is now reasonable to label global warming, more formally known as Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) a fraud perpetrated by a group of self-serving scientists, doomsayers, and wannabes. For years we’ve been bombarded with scary forecasts and dire reports of man-made catastrophe. Skepticism was met with dismissive ridicule as deniers, equating critics with Holocaust deniers. Fascism was the modis operandi - Time for Obama to Reset? No, Time for Obama to Resign (November 28, 2009)
Politico asks “Should Obama hit the reset button on the White House? If so, where might he find it?” My thoughts as I wrote to Politico and as they have now published: Should Obama hit the reset button? You’re kidding right?! Step One: Obama should apologize for bankrupting the country, going around the world and apologizing for us as if it - Ten stupid qualifiers makes for one big loser of a party (November 27, 2009)
Yep, 10 unelected members of the Republican Party are working hard to ensure defeat in next year’s election with their proposed litmus test of party members. Now, as I’ve made clear on my Web site, I am registered as a Republican but pretty much in name only. I truly consider myself an independent. Working my way through the proposed statements that I must - Hey guys, we’ve got a problem – George Monbiont (November 25, 2009)
George Monbiont – never heard of him until this past week – is out with another ‘we got a problem’ article in the Guardian today as he frets over the damage being done to the religion of global warming [and his career] by the actions and incompetence of the scientific community. Interesting that other than his buried apology in a comment attached - Didn’t anyone ever look at the code?! (November 25, 2009)
There are several updates from folks reviewing the CRU software code that paint a devestating picture of the science of global warming (More below). As I read these, I keep coming back to the 1960 date. Newer data did not bear out global warming which global warming advocates had staked their careers. Therefore they played with it and made it up - CRU Code Review (November 25, 2009)
A lot of folks are looking at the CRU Code that lays the foundation for the fraud of global warming. Bishop Hill has a growing list of findings (below). Bore Patch offers another take (above). Here is a snapshot of the list from Bishop Hill (Visit for updates): Francis at L’Ombré De L’Olivier says the coding language is inappropriate. Also inappropriate use - About George Monbiot’s “Apology” (November 24, 2009)
Anthony Watts (WattsUpWithThat) and Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun) are out with new posts and articles noting a so-called “apology” from George Monbiot, “one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming faith.” (Watts). What apology?! First, take a look at what George Monbiot writes on his blog: It’s no use pretending that this isn’t a major blow. The emails extracted by

