Posts Tagged ‘Tim Osborne’
Didn’t anyone ever look at the code?!
There are several updates from folks reviewing the CRU software code that paint a devestating picture of the science of global warming (More below). As I read these, I keep coming back to the 1960 date. Newer data did not bear out global warming which global warming advocates had staked their careers. Therefore they played with it and made it up to get the results they wanted. What they seem to miss in this scientific fraud is that the newer data might be more relaible and that instead of it being wrong, maybe their old data and the entire approach or methodology was the problem.
The code documentation and write read me files releaseed last week are so incredibly unprofessional to be almost unbelieveable. They raise big red flags about what was transpiring. Didn’t anyone ever look at the code?!
CRU Code Review
A lot of folks are looking at the CRU Code that lays the foundation for the fraud of global warming. Bishop Hill has a growing list of findings (below). Bore Patch offers another take (above).
News
Editorial: Hiding Evidence of Global Cooling (Washington Times)
Conclusion: “These revelations of fudged science should have a cooling effect on global-warming hysteria and the panicked policies that are being pushed forward to address the unproven theory.”
About George Monbiot’s “Apology”
Anthony Watts (WattsUpWithThat) and Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun) are out with new posts and articles noting a so-called “apology” from George Monbiot, “one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming faith.” (Watts). What apology?!
1,073 Email and 55MB of Files: The Fraud of Global Warming Exposed
Hackers recently seized and released 1,073 emails and 55MB of files from Climate Report and the University of East Anglia. Not unexpected on today’s Internet but the results are explosive. The content of the emails unequivocally show that global warming is a fraud and that scientists involved actively perpetrated this fraud.
Like so many others I have downloaded the hacked files and have begun perusing the emails. First, I’ve got to suspect the scientists involved feel very violated to find their emails now on the Internet for everyone to read. Interesting to note that they are admitted as genuine from several media reports (Phil Jones admits files taken, defends content; Gavin Schmidt says his are genuine). Second, they should be concerned about repercussions, whether they should have attorneys, and maybe whether it might be time to quietly retire. For Al Gore and others making a career out of global warning, this has to be a bone chilling moment as their entire religious crusade is exposed as fraud. What do they do? Admit it? Explain it away? Or, try to ignore it?